Lawyer referral is a good source: If your friend liked it, he was treated well (regardless of whether he was successful in the action). Nowadays, the internet can be a good source: if you like the site or an article written, you can contact the lawyer or the office and see if you feel safe with the professional in a phone or personal conversation.

The lawyer such as Stone & Associates may or may not charge for the initial consultation: It is an option for each professional, and it does not mean that the lawyer who charges is a mercenary.

Our criterion is: if the consultation is a more technical opinion, with eventual analysis of documents, I will charge. If it’s just a conversation with an exposition of legal and extrajudicial options, without going into the details of the case, I don’t charge. This is very private, and it is up to the client to decide whether to pay for the consultation.

But we warn you: when you pay, it’s best to ask more detailed questions and leave with a good idea of ​​what will happen in court. Paying for the consultation, the analysis of the case deserves to be more in-depth. Also, always ask for a payment receipt; it’s your right!

A good indication that the lawyer such as Theft and Property Crimes Attorney in Philadelphia, PA is serious is that he will give the receipt without you asking because he knows it is his obligation.

The price: This subject is often the most sensitive but shouldn’t be. More important are quality and empathy.

There is no fixed rule for setting fees, but some parameters exist. First, it should be said that a table from the OAB determines the minimum value of services in general. This table varies by state and is available on the State OAB website.

There are the minimum values; lawyers will probably charge these amounts at the beginning of their careers and by lawyers with some personal relationship with the client. This table represents the minimum that the lawyer must charge, as recommended by the OAB. The more experienced and specialized the lawyer, the higher the price.

Something that also directly influences the price is the complexity of the case: how much time that process will occupy the lawyer; how the fact must be proved (the more difficult, the more argumentation), how many authors are in the case (many authors means more documentation, a greater volume of evidence), etc. I think it is good practice for the lawyer to explain, albeit, in a simplified way, the reason for the amount charged since the client often feels exploited by the lawyer – which could easily be remedied if the lawyer explained the complexity of the work, taking a few short minutes. I understand that between the nominal value and the absurd, there is a worthy value compatible with the “expertise” of each professional.